THE END OF THE MORDEN STATE IN MEXICO

The study of the modern State in the West is the most important thing to understand life, since, it is born in a well-founded and organized society that has had to conform in some way or another to be able to coexist. In the present case, we were born in a state named the United States Mexican, constituted by federal republic, representative, democratic and lay, commonly it is only called Mexico. However, this being represents the most problem in the life of the Mexican nation and it cannot be in another way because of the various and complicated interests of all type: sociological, cultural, class, juridical, political, economic and other nature. Notwithstanding the previous, the present book will introduce to the public power, its organic and institutional structure and it will proffer analyse the transition of the modern state to the hipper modern state. The book will be divided in two parts. The first is designated to the expository study of the modern state, the second will have a destructive part, negative, but at the same time it will propose a new state structure and its respective terminology. The modern state has its own characteristics and it adopted the theory of the "division of powers" of Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brede et de Montesquieu, generally referred to as simply Montesquieu. His book bears a title even more extensive than of its author: "Of the spirit of the laws or of the relation that the laws must have with the Constitution of each government, the customs, the climate, the religion and the commerce..." And that gives a clear idea of the teleology of the book. The book is impressive by its harmonic and deep structure in its most important part. Twenty years of work. In spite of it, his theory of the "Division of the powers" bears printed a fatal mistake, confuse "power" with "organ". This problem, apparently insignificant and just thing of linguistic terms, in reality it is translated in an ontological problem (what exists and its relations whit the existent) that carries with it serious consequences to the people. We do not advance the subject and when the point has arrived, you will see what I am talking about. Now well, the modern state began to dismantle itself at the beginning of the decade of 1980 with the start of the privatization of the public goods. There was not reverse. The Free Trade Agreements formalized the termination of the modern state, it was signed in 1992 and it entered into force in January 1^st, 1994. This resulted in the gradual abandonment of the state model with a juridical system of rectory of the economy, and a legal system of a private and individualistic nature was adopted.

A minimum state, guardian of private property, arbitrator of adverse interests. The year 1989 was crucial for the triumph of Neoliberalism and that was the beginning of the fall of the socialist bloc headed by The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). Without any competition the neoliberalism launched itself to conquer the world market, imposing deregulations on weak national states to resist harassment and it was knocking down barriers of all type and it launched the west world to a super production and a hyper consume than only favours transnational corporations.